guioconnor’s posterous

Guilherme Zühlke O'Connor's random thoughts, links and tutorials. 
« Back to blog

Dear @spotify can I have a cloud-play-queue instead of a remote control?

First and foremost, a thanks is in order for Spotify service is awesome! Yes, some of us would like to find more things that are less mainstream and the quality of the ads (for those who don't pay the premium membership) is really bad. Still, it's a fabulous service for a very good price.

You see, I've seen people asking for a remote control application for their phones so they can control spotify running on the computer while they move around (or lie down somewhere they can't be bothered to walk to the computer) but I think right now I'd like the converse of that.

Let me explain, I've just paid for Spotify, essentially to be able to use it on the iPhone. As I'm working from my sofa with my laptop and it's not handy at all to plug it into the HiFi while I'm working, so I plugged my iPhone instead.

The problem is that I can't control the playlist from here. The laptop is a much better interface to manage playlists and play queues, plus, it's right in front of me while the iPhone is a bit further away.

Since both laptop and iPhone are connected on the same account, fairly enough, only one of them is allowed to play at the same time so one pauses whenever the other starts. Now, instead of creating remote controls to every pair of devices around, a more interesting option could perhaps be that multiple devices can control the same play queue without necessarily changing the audio source.

You see? If I check the play queue on the laptop I'll be able to see what's ahead and change it, the iPhone will react to this without switching the audio source. With no additional implementation, whenever the computer is the audio source the phone can play the role of remote control.

This way remote control is handled for all the combinatory explosion of device pairs without any extra effort to produce remote control applications. Life in the cloud, the true way!

Comments (5)

Jan 14, 2010
Spotify said...
We don't have imminent plans to create a remote but there are a number of 3rd party developers working on it. For example: http://remoteless.no/
Jan 14, 2010
Thanks for the reply, but actually my suggestion is of having a cloud based play queue, so a remote becomes unnecessary.
Jan 14, 2010
Spotify said...
Ah, I see. :) But isn't a playlists almost the same as a cloud-based queue? You could just edit the playlist remotely and play from that?
Jan 14, 2010
Ha, I see what you mean! That solves the half the problem right away leaving out only the ability to issue commands (play/pause/volume/etc) from one interface to the other.

Still, the play queue on Spotify has a certain dynamicity that ordinary playlists don't have. Notably, played songs are removed automatically and further songs from a search are added automatically after the selected ones.

I think this behaviour is quite an improvement over traditional playlists, it would be nice to have a cloud based play queue, which it would make sense to be unique, precisely because of such dynamicity.

The ability to share the play queue among several clients on the same account but lock the audio source to one would automatically detach the client from the audio source still making it possible to be transparently controlled.

Thanks for you comments, in any case.

Jan 14, 2010
Ah, forgot to mention. The regular playlist approach doesn't let you see what's currently playing which the play queue does.

Leave a comment...